Taonezvi Mutandwa & 2 Ors v Probrands (Pvt) Ltd

### Preamble
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF ZIMBABWE
JUDGMENT NO. LC/H/110/2013
HELD IN HARARE, APRIL 4, 2013
CASE NO. LC/H/383/12
In the Matter Between
---------




IN THE LABOUR COURT OF ZIMBABWE 	JUDGMENT NO. LC/H/110/2013

HELD IN HARARE, APRIL 4, 2013		CASE NO. LC/H/383/12

In the Matter Between

TAONEZVI MUTANDWA			       	1st APPELLANT

JOHN TSAHA						2ND APPELLANT

TRUST DANGIRWA					3RD APPELLANT

And

PROBRANDS (PVT) LTD			       	RESPONDENT

Before The Honourable E. Makamure         : President

FOR THE APPELLANTS     		:  (Connolly Mutandwa, John Tsaha and Trust

Dangirwa)

FOR THE RESPONDENT  	: Mr J. Mtelela (Human Resources Manager)

MAKAMURE E.,

In this appeal the appellants were aggrieved by the determination of an arbitrator.  The Labour Act Chapter 28:01 stipulates that only issues of law may be brought on appeal against a determination of an arbitrator.  In this matter the arbitrator made a factual finding that the appellants were fairly dismissed after committing the alleged offences.  The grounds of appeal raise issues of a factual nature.  These grounds are therefore not properly before the Court.  Further, there is no averrement that the Learned Arbitrator misdirected himself on the facts and that such misdirection amounted to a misdirection at law.  In the circumstances there is no merit in the appeal.  The appeal fails.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the appeal be and is hereby dismissed.   No order as to costs.

Appellants In Person.

Group Human Resources Manager, Representative of the Respondent.