Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Back to Labour Court
Judgment record

Pretty Makuni v Old Mutual Shared Services (Pvt) Ltd

Labour Court of Zimbabwe4 June 2021
[2021] ZWLC 58LC/H/58/20212021
Viewing: Word Document
Loading document...
Full text archive

Judgment text copy

A clean reading copy is shown below. Use Download for the original formatted document.
### Preamble
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF ZIMBABWE
JUDGMENT NO LC/H/58/2021
HARARE, 18 MAY 2021 &
4 JUNE 2021
CASE NO LC/H/230/19
---------


IN THE LABOUR COURT OF ZIMBABWE	   JUDGMENT NO LC/H/58/2021

HARARE, 18 MAY 2021&				          CASE NO LC/H/230/19

4 JUNE  2021

In the matter between:-

PRETTY MAKUNI						APPELLANT

AND

OLD MUTUAL SHARED SERVICES (PVT) LTD	RESPONDENT

Before the Honourable Kudya J

For the Applicant			S. Dizwani  (Legal  Practitioner)

For the Respondent			T. Chagudumba (Legal Practitioner)

KUDYA, J:

On the set down date of the appeal by the appellant against the respondents appeals bodys decision in a labor dispute between appellant and her employer the employer took the point that the appeal was bad at law as it attacked the hearing officer’s decision and not the appeals officer’s decision.  It is only this point which is addressed by this ruling.

It is apparent from a reading of the appeal grounds that it attacks the hearing officer’s findings and decision primarily.  Even though in the introduction line the appellant says it is attacking the appeals officers’ decision she does not go on to do that. Her argument is that since the appeals officer almost verbatim agreed with the hearing officer’s findings and decision she did found it necessary to refer throughout to the failures of the hearing officer. It is patently clear from the opening paragraph of the appeal that what the employee wanted to attack were the findings by the appeal’s officer.  Sadly she did not do such but instead chose to attack the hearing officer as if her appeal was against the hearing officer’s decision. For that reason the appeal is out of step with what the law requires and should thus be struck off the roll.

IT IS ORDERED THAT

Appeal being improperly before the court it be and is hereby struck off the roll with costs.

Hove Legal Practice, Appellant’s legal Practitioners

Atherstone and Cook, Respondent’s legal Practitioners
Pretty Makuni v Old Mutual Shared Services (Pvt) Ltd — Labour Court of Zimbabwe | Zalari