Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Back to Labour Court
Judgment record

Donald Dombo and T. Mashavira v The Cotton Company of Zimbabwe Ltd.

Labour Court of Zimbabwe13 July 2012
[2012] ZWLC 243LC/H/243/122012
Viewing: Word Document
Loading document...
Full text archive

Judgment text copy

A clean reading copy is shown below. Use Download for the original formatted document.
### Preamble
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF ZIMBABWE
JUDGMENT NO. LC/H/243/12
HELD IN HARARE 28, JUNE, 2012
CASE NO. LC/REV/H/83/11
And 13th JULY, 2012
---------


IN THE LABOUR COURT OF ZIMBABWE 	JUDGMENT NO. LC/H/243/12

HELD IN HARARE 28, JUNE, 2012		CASE NO. LC/REV/H/83/11

And 13th JULY, 2012

In the Matter Between

DONALD DOMBO				     		1st Applicant

And

T. MASHAVIRA 						2ND  Applicant

Vs.

THE COTTON COMPANY OF ZIMBABWE LTD.		Respondent

Before The Honourable L. Matanda-Moyo         : President

For Applicants    		: Mr Z.R. Kajokoto (Legal Practitioner)

For The Respondent  	: Mr C. Mavunga (Legal Practitioner)

MATANDA-MOYO L.,

This is an application for a review of the proceedings held before the Respondent. Applicants are seeking an order quashing the proceedings and  that fresh proceedings be held before an independent Labour Officer of Arbitrator. At the onset of the proceedings the Respondent’s Counsel raised a point in limine that there was no proper application before me. I dismissed that the application and indicated reasons would follow alongside the main judgment. These are the reasons:

Respondent’s Counsel argued that the application before me did not comply with Rule 16 of the Labour Court Rules. An application for review should set out the grounds and facts upon which it is based. Counsel for the Respondent argued that the application does not state the grounds on which this Court may review the decision of the Respondent. Counsel for the Respondent