{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator erred in finding that appellant had unlawfully dismissed the respondent","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Disagreements at workplace, respondent leaving employment, report to union"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator erred in finding that appellant had not granted respondent vacation leave","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Leave during school holidays, 90 days cash in lieu of leave award"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there is evidence of gross misdirection to warrant interference with the Arbitrator's decision","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's dissatisfaction with arbitration award"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant employed respondent as a domestic worker. Following disagreements, respondent reported the matter to union officers leading to arbitration. The Arbitrator found in favour of respondent, finding unlawful dismissal and ordering payment for leave days. Appellant appealed, contending she did not dismiss respondent and that leave was granted.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases