{"issue_text":"Whether this court should grant a declaratory order regarding the currency in which the Advance Payment Guarantee should be paid, given the pending Supreme Court appeal.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The existence of the guarantee and the pending Supreme Court appeal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the debt under the Advance Payment Guarantee was converted from USD to RTGS and then to ZIG by Statutory Instruments 33/19 and 60/24.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no (not decided due to procedural finding)","related_facts":"The statutory changes and the nature of the debt"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant issued an Advance Payment Guarantee of USD 16 million in favour of the first respondent at the instance of the second respondent. A dispute arose between the first and second respondents, leading to arbitration and subsequent appeals. The applicant seeks a declaratory order regarding the currency in which payment should be made, arguing that Statutory Instruments 33/19 and 60/24 converted the debt from USD to RTGS and then to ZIG.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases