{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award is contrary to the public policy of Zimbabwe and should be set aside under Article 34 of the Model Law.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The award's impact on the applicant's financial sustainability and the lack of evidence provided by the applicant to the arbitrator."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to set aside an arbitral award that granted wage increases of 15% and 7.5% to different employee bands, arguing it was contrary to public policy as it would render operations unsustainable and was discriminatory. The applicant failed to provide evidence before the arbitrator regarding its financial position.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases