correction of judgmentback payquantificationfunctus officioLabour Act
Tags
correction of orderquantificationback payfunctus officio
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the court should correct the order to include a monetary figure of $100,315.60 for back pay.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The absence of the figure in the original order and draft; the presence of the figure in a document not formally before the court."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court is functus officio in relation to the quantification application.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The original order was final; the applicant seeks to add substantive relief."}
{"issue_text":"Whether adding the figure would alter the sense and substance of the original order.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The original order granted the application without specifying amount; adding amount changes the substantive relief."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant obtained an order granting an application for quantification of back pay, but the order did not specify a monetary amount. The applicant now seeks to correct the order by inserting a specific figure of $100,315.60. The respondent argues that the court cannot correct the order to add a monetary figure as it would be reopening the case and the court is functus officio.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases