Zimbabwe Revenue Authority v Neville Manyemwe

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding that the respondent was appointed an acting supervisor and authorized to value motor vehicles.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Evidence regarding appointment by B C Ndlovu and G Kuzanga; respondent's submissions regarding duties."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in holding that the issue of how valuations were done became academic once authorization was established.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The respondent's alleged use of incorrect procedure."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator was obliged to award specific damages when ordering reinstatement.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The arbitrator ordered reinstatement without specifying damages."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in applying the parity principle regarding the treatment of other employees.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Different treatment of F Makuyana."}

Background