Zimbabwe Revenue Authority v Mike Harris Toyota (Pvt) Ltd and Kevin Terry (NO)

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award conflicts with public policy of Zimbabwe under Article 34(2)(b)(ii) of the Arbitration Act.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator's dismissal of applicant's claims for cancellation and reimbursement."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator attempted to rewrite the contract for the parties.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant's contention that award is contrary to contract terms."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator failed to consider submissions and determine on breach of contract.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant's contention that arbitrator failed to address breach."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator's reasoning was grossly outrageous in failing to award anything to the applicant.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant's contention regarding the arbitrator's treatment of payment evidence."}

Background