Zimbabwe Revenue Authority and The Minister for Finance, Economic Development and Investment Promotion versus Zimbabwe Revenue and Allied Workers’ Union and Honourable Arbitrator Arthur Marara N.O. and Honourable Arbitrator George Makings N.O.
{"issue_text":"Whether the Minister has locus standi to challenge the arbitral award.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Minister's non-participation in arbitration proceedings"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award is contrary to the public policy of Zimbabwe.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award exceeds approved budget; budget cycle closed; award is unimplementable"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the award of the 13th cheque can be challenged.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"ZIMRA's position on discretionary vs non-discretionary bonus"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties engaged in collective bargaining for salary increases for the period July to December 2023. A deadlock ensued, leading to arbitration. The arbitrators awarded a 300% salary increase and a non-discretionary 13th cheque. The applicants, ZIMRA and the Minister, argue that this award exceeds ZIMRA's approved budget and is therefore contrary to public policy and unimplementable.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases