leave to filesupplementary affidavitcompany resolutiondeponent authority
Tags
supplementary affidavitprocedural applicationauthority to represent
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Court Rules, 2017
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file a supplementary affidavit to provide proof of authority for the deponent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Challenge to deponent's authority; previous striking out of answering affidavit; Court order requiring proper application"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent's preliminary jurisdictional points have merit","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent's argument that LCH 36/25 is a nullity"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant sought leave to file a supplementary affidavit in matter LCH 36/25 to provide proof of authority for the deponent to the founding affidavit after respondent challenged such authority. The Court had previously struck out an answering affidavit and ordered a proper application for leave. Respondent opposed, arguing the application was unnecessary and raised preliminary jurisdictional points.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases