Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Zimbabwe National Water Authority v Hippo Valley Estates Limited & Anor

SC 55/19

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
20 June 2019
Citation
SC 55/19
Neutral Citation
[2019] ZWSC 55/19
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
MAVANGIRA JA
Author
Mavangira JA
Full Bench
Mavangira JAPatel JAUchena JA
Areas of Law
Administrative LawWater LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Tariff increaseZINWAReviewAppeal to MinisterLis alibi pendens
Tags
Water tariffsStatutory authorityJudicial reviewExhaustion of domestic remedies
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Zimbabwe National Water Authority Act
  • Zimbabwe National Water Authority Act
  • Water Act
  • Water Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo was correct in dismissing the appellant's point in limine that the review application was not properly before the court due to the pending appeal to the Minister","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The respondents had noted an appeal to the Minister under s 49 of the ZINWA Act on 19 January 2016, which was still pending when they filed the review application on 2 February 2016"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether special circumstances existed to justify departing from the exhaustion of domestic remedies principle","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The respondents argued the appeal to the Minister would be futile because the Minister had already approved the tariff increase"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the principle of lis alibi pendens applied to the proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The same matter was pending before the Minister and the High Court simultaneously"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant (ZINWA) increased water tariffs for commercial agriculture from $9.45 to $12.00 per megalitre, citing a government budget pronouncement. The respondents objected and filed a review application in the High Court, while simultaneously noting an appeal to the Minister under s 49 of the ZINWA Act. The High Court granted the review, but the Supreme Court found the respondents failed to exhaust domestic remedies.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →