{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator committed a gross misdirection on the facts amounting to a misdirection in law","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator awarding 2.5 years salary without evidentiary basis"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent was a full-time employee or a Consultant","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature of relationship under consultancy agreement"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appeal was properly before the Court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Point in limine raised by respondent"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was engaged by the appellant as a Consultant under a consultancy agreement. The consultancy agreement was terminated in July 2013. The respondent claimed unlawful dismissal and non-payment of terminal benefits and salaries, alleging he was a full-time employee. The Arbitrator found in favor of the respondent and ordered the appellant to pay US$17,605.50 for 2.5 years. The appellant appealed, arguing gross misdirection on the facts.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases