Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Zimbabwe Assemblies of God Africa (ZAOGA) v Kasikai Mashonganyika

SC 43/18

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
19 July 2018
Citation
SC 43/18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWSC 43
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
GWAUNZA JA
Full Bench
GWAUNZA JAGUVAVA JAMAVANGIRA JA
Areas of Law
Labour LawArbitration Law
Keywords
locus standirepresentationarbitratorlabour consultantstatutory interpretation
Tags
Representation in ArbitrationLabour ConsultantsArbitration ActLabour Act
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether a labour consultant has the authority to represent a party in arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Representation of respondent by labour consultant in arbitration"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Labour Act provisions on representation override the Arbitration Act provisions","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Conflict between Section 92 of Labour Act and Article 24(4) of Arbitration Act"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Labour Court correctly interpreted the statutory provisions on representation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Labour Court's dismissal of appellant's appeal"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondent was employed by the appellant as a watchman and claimed underpayment of salaries and allowances. He was represented by a labour consultant in arbitration proceedings. The appellant challenged the consultant's representation, arguing it was not permitted under the Labour Act. The arbitrator and Labour Court both rejected this challenge.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →