Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

ZELLCO CELLULLAR (PVT) LTD versus NETONE CELLULLAR (PVT) LTD and DR CALLISTUS NDLOVU and REWARD KANGAI and LYNDON NKOMO

HH 32-2012

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
1 February 2012
Citation
HH 32-2012
Neutral Citation
[2012] ZWHH 32
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
GOWORA J
Full Bench
GOWORA J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureCompany LawContract Law
Keywords
ContemptCorporate DirectorsCourt OrderService Provider AgreementText Message
Tags
Contempt of CourtCorporate LawInterdict
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court (Fees and Allowances) Rules
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant should be denied a hearing due to alleged contempt of a costs order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant's failure to pay costs in HC 3639/11"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the second, third, and fourth respondents were properly cited in contempt proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Directors were not served with the court order personally"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the first respondent was in wilful contempt of the court order","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First respondent's publication of retraction directing customers to pay it instead of applicant"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant obtained a provisional order restraining the first respondent from cancelling a Service Provider Agreement. The first respondent allegedly breached this order by publishing a retraction text message that directed customers to pay the first respondent instead of the applicant. The applicant then launched contempt proceedings against the first respondent and its directors.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →