Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Zedias Janyure and 4 Others v NRZ

HB 03/21

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
25 March 2021
Citation
HB 03/21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHB 3
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Moyo J
Full Bench
Moyo JMakonese J
Areas of Law
Property LawLabour Law
Keywords
evictionformer employeescollective bargaining agreementaccommodationtermination of employment
Tags
evictionformer employeescollective bargaining agreement
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether appellants had right to remain in occupation of respondent's properties after cessation of employment","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Termination of employment by 2013; occupation of company properties"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether clause 4 of Collective Bargaining Agreement SI 61/99 applies to former employees","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"SI 61/99 governs relationship; appellants are former employees"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether alleged debt of $25,000 creates right of retention over accommodation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellants claim $25,000 owed; occupying company properties"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellants, former employees of NRZ, were housed in company properties during employment. After termination of employment (last termination in 2013), the respondent sued for eviction. The appellants claimed they could not be evicted because the respondent owed them $25,000, while the respondent admitted owing only $10,000 which was paid in full.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →