Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

ZAOGA v Kasikai Mashonganyika

JUDGMENT NO LC/H/779/2016

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
17 November 2016
Citation
JUDGMENT NO LC/H/779/2016
Neutral Citation
[2016] ZWLC 779
Judgment No.
LC/H/779/2016
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Chivizhe J
Full Bench
Chivizhe J
Areas of Law
Labour LawArbitration Law
Keywords
Labour ConsultantRepresentationArbitration ActLabour Act
Tags
RepresentationArbitrationLocus Standi
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Arbitration Act
  • Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator erred on a question of law when he found that a Labour Consultant has locus standi to represent a party in arbitration proceedings","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Representation of respondent by Labour Consultant E Mhere in arbitration proceedings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondent was employed by the appellant and referred a complaint of underpayment of wages to the labour officer. When conciliation failed, the matter was referred to compulsory arbitration. The appellant raised a preliminary point that the respondent's representative, a Labour Consultant, had no locus standi to represent him in arbitration proceedings.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →