Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Zanele Muchenje and Tafara Muchenje v Minister of Local Government and Public Works N.O and Arusome Property Development (Pvt) Ltd and Tanyaradzwa Sharon Bwanya and Registrar of Deeds N.O and Munyaradzi Bwanya

HH 840-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
18 November 2022
Citation
HH 840-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 840
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
ZHOU J
Full Bench
ZHOU J
Areas of Law
Property LawCivil ProcedureAdministrative Law
Keywords
possessiondispossessionstatus quolease cancellationunlawful occupation
Tags
SpoliationMandament van spolieContempt of courtLease agreementEviction
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N/A
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have established the requirements for a mandament van spolie.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Acts of first respondent (bricks, cabin, letter); Applicants' continued occupation"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the first respondent is in contempt of court for violating the status quo order in HC 3900/22.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Acts of first respondent (bricks, cabin, letter); Status quo order"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants were former lessees of a property whose lease was cancelled by the Government. They remained in occupation. A new lessee, the first respondent, was allocated the property and took steps including delivering bricks and a cabin to the property, and writing to the City Council. The applicants sought a spoliation order and alleged contempt of court, claiming these acts deprived them of possession.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →