{"issue_text":"Whether the delay in filing the review application was inordinate","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The review was filed 12 months after the award was granted"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the explanation for the delay was reasonable","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant blamed former lawyers for bad advice"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has prospects of success on review","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant claims arbitrator misinterpreted contract"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought condonation for filing a review application 12 months out of time to challenge an arbitral award granted against him. The applicant had previously filed three separate applications to challenge the award, all of which were dismissed. The court found the delay inordinate and the explanation for the delay unreasonable.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases