WOMEN IN LAW IN SOUTHERN AFRICA, TALENT FORGET v MINISTER OF HEALTH AND CHILD CARE and THE PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ZIMBABWE
Termination of PregnancyChildren's RightsConstitutional LawWomen's Rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
Termination of Pregnancy Act
Termination of Pregnancy Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether section 2(1) of the Termination of Pregnancy Act is unconstitutional for excluding pregnancy from minors and marital rape victims from the definition of \"unlawful intercourse\"","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Definition of unlawful intercourse; age of consent; criminalization of marital rape"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court should read in or sever provisions of section 2(1) or declare it invalid","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Court's power under section 175(6) of Constitution"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, WOMEN IN LAW IN SOUTHERN AFRICA and TALENT FORGET, brought a constitutional application seeking to declare section 2(1) of the Termination of Pregnancy Act unconstitutional. They argued that the definition of "unlawful intercourse" should be expanded to include pregnancy from minors and marital rape victims to allow them access to legal abortion under section 4 of the Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases