record of proceedingspaginationcosts on higher scalestruck off roll
Tags
record of proceedingscostspunitive costs
legislation
Statutes Cited
Rules of the Labour Court of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Should costs on a higher (punitive) scale be awarded against the appellant?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The defective record of proceedings and both parties' responsibility for it"}
{"issue_text":"Should the matter be struck off the roll?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Consent by both parties and defective record"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against the respondent. Both parties consented to have the matter struck off the roll because the record of proceedings was not properly compiled, with different pagination and missing documents. The respondent sought costs on a higher scale, which the appellant opposed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases