Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Constitutional Court

Webster Tongoona Rushesha (in his capacity as the legal guardian of Tivonga Sacha Rushesha) & 2 Ors v Alexious Mashingaidze Dera & 5 Ors

CCZ 24/17

Case Details

Court
Constitutional Court
Date
22 November 2017
Citation
CCZ 24/17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWCCZ 24
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
GWAUNZA JCC
Full Bench
GWAUNZA JCCGOWORA JCCHLATSHWAYO JCCGUVAVA JCCMAVANGIRA JCCUCHENA JCCZIYAMBI AJCCCHIWESHE AJCCMAKONI AJCC
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawProperty LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Constitutional Court compositionDeputy Chief JusticeAppeal to Constitutional CourtJurisdictionShares in immovable property
Tags
Constitutional Court jurisdictionProper constitution of courtAppealability of Supreme Court judgmentsShare transferImmovable property
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Constitutional Court was properly constituted without a Deputy Chief Justice during the transitional period under the 6th Schedule to the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The Deputy Chief Justice post was vacant; the Chief Justice was appointed on 29 March 2017; the hearing was on 28 June 2017"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether an appeal lies to the Constitutional Court against a Supreme Court judgment that did not determine a constitutional issue","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The Supreme Court judgment did not determine any constitutional issue; the appellants did not raise constitutional issues before the Supreme Court"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether costs on an attorney and client scale should be awarded against the appellants","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The appellants persisted with the appeal despite existing case law; they raised the preliminary point at the hearing rather than beforehand"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The dispute relates to contested ownership and transfer of shares in certain immovable property located in Mt Pleasant, Harare. The Supreme Court upheld an appeal against a High Court decision in favour of the appellants. The appellants then filed this purported appeal to the Constitutional Court.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →