Washington Mareya v Zimbabwe Power Company

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the Disciplinary Authority erred in finding the appellant guilty of misconduct regarding the failure to ensure a feasibility study was conducted and the release of funds without a guarantee.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Failure to ensure feasibility study; signing payment release without guarantee; lack of written protest."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the Disciplinary Authority erred in imposing the penalty of dismissal.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature of misconduct; political pressure; relationship between parties."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the Disciplinary Authority erred in not requiring viva voce evidence.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Facts were largely common cause."}

Background