{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has established a clear right for the purposes of an interim interdict.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The existence of a valid lease agreement for Stands 8112 and 8114."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the matter is urgent.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no (point dismissed)","related_facts":"The 7-day delay between the start of construction and the filing of the application."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has a cause of action.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no (point dismissed)","related_facts":"The alleged cancellation of the lease agreement by the City of Harare."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court is functus officio.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no (point dismissed)","related_facts":"The prior eviction order in HC 6212/20."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the interdict.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicant's long-term occupation vs. the respondent's construction activities."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has no other satisfactory remedy.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The pending case HCH 7008/23."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, Warren Hills Golf Club, occupied land under a lease agreement with the City of Harare. The first respondent, Sunshine Development, claimed ownership of the land and obtained an eviction order for one stand (8113). The applicant sought an interdict to stop construction on two other stands (8112 and 8114) pending the outcome of a separate case challenging the cancellation of its lease.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases