Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

VIRIMAI MAKUZVA and KUNDAI MAKUZVA and YEUKAI CHEU (NEE MAKUZVA) versus VIOLA MACHERA (NEE MAKUZVA) and NENGOMASHA FAMILY TRUST and WILSON MANASE (IN HIS CAPACITY AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE LATE MUCHANDIBAYA MAKUZVA) and MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT and REGISTRAR OF DEEDS

HH 772-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
2 November 2022
Citation
HH 772-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 772
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
MAXWELL J
Full Bench
MAXWELL J
Areas of Law
Succession LawProperty LawAdministrative Law
Keywords
Locus StandiPrescriptionExecutorBeneficiariesDeed of Transfer
Tags
Estate AdministrationProperty LawWillTrust
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Administration of Estates Act
  • Administration of Estates Act
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have locus standi to institute the proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The will intended to transfer property to a Trust that was never created; the applicants are beneficiaries under the will but not specifically named as beneficiaries of the Trust"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants approached the court using the correct statutory provisions","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants claimed to be suing under section 120 of the Administration of Estates Act but that section deals with authority from the Master to sell property, not removal of executors"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants' claim has prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The alleged fraudulent transfer occurred in 2004; the application was filed in 2019; applicants became aware of the transfer 15 years ago"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The deceased, Muchandibaya Makuzva, died in 2001 leaving a will that intended to transfer a property to a Makuzva Trust which was never created. The property was allegedly fraudulently transferred to the first respondent in 2004. The applicants, who are beneficiaries under the will, sought to set aside the transfer and eviction of subsequent purchasers. The respondents raised preliminary points including that the applicants lacked locus standi and that the claim had prescribed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →