Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Virginia Chidhakwa (nee Machokoto) v Manala Loveness Motsi and Another

HB 138.20

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
2 July 2020
Citation
HB 138.20
Neutral Citation
[2020] ZWHB 138
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
KABASA J
Author
Kabasa J
Full Bench
Kabasa J
Areas of Law
Administration of EstatesSuccession Law
Keywords
ExecutorEstate AdministrationAccountabilityMaster's FeesDistribution Account
Tags
Deceased EstateExecutrix DativeRemoval of Executor
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Administration of Estates Act
  • Administration of Estates Act
  • Administration of Estates Act
  • Administration of Estates Act
  • Deceased Estates Succession Act
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has locus standi to apply for the removal of the Executrix Dative under section 85(1) of the Administration of Estates Act, or if such power is exclusive to the Master under section 117(1).","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicant is a beneficiary; the Master has not removed the respondent."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether sufficient cause exists to remove the 1st respondent as Executrix Dative under section 85(1) of the Administration of Estates Act.","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delays since 2014, sale of property, failure to account, non-payment of fees, contradictory evidence."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, a beneficiary of a deceased estate, sought the removal of the 1st respondent as Executrix Dative for failing to finalise the estate since her appointment in 2014, selling a property without necessity, failing to account for rentals, and not paying Master's fees. The 1st respondent claimed she had lodged a distribution account and was awaiting approval, but the Master's report contradicted her claims and supported the applicant's allegations of misconduct and delay.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →