Deceased EstateExecutrix DativeRemoval of Executor
legislation
Statutes Cited
Administration of Estates Act
Administration of Estates Act
Administration of Estates Act
Administration of Estates Act
Deceased Estates Succession Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has locus standi to apply for the removal of the Executrix Dative under section 85(1) of the Administration of Estates Act, or if such power is exclusive to the Master under section 117(1).","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicant is a beneficiary; the Master has not removed the respondent."}
{"issue_text":"Whether sufficient cause exists to remove the 1st respondent as Executrix Dative under section 85(1) of the Administration of Estates Act.","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delays since 2014, sale of property, failure to account, non-payment of fees, contradictory evidence."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a beneficiary of a deceased estate, sought the removal of the 1st respondent as Executrix Dative for failing to finalise the estate since her appointment in 2014, selling a property without necessity, failing to account for rentals, and not paying Master's fees. The 1st respondent claimed she had lodged a distribution account and was awaiting approval, but the Master's report contradicted her claims and supported the applicant's allegations of misconduct and delay.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases