{"issue_text":"Whether the disciplinary proceedings before the first respondent were validly conducted in the absence of the appellant.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's failure to attend hearing; respondents proceeding in absence; alleged wilful default."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant was furnished with a record of the proceedings before the first respondent.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's claim of no access to record; court a quo finding of furnished record."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the penalty imposed on the appellant is valid.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Penalty citing wrong statutory provision; respondents not determining period of unsuitability."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a director of Verocy Real Estate (Private) Limited, was charged by the Estate Agents Council with unprofessional conduct for misrepresenting a property sale and operating without a principal real estate agent. After multiple postponements, the appellant failed to attend the hearing, and the Council proceeded in her absence, finding her guilty and imposing penalties including a bar from estate agency business and restitution of US$120,000. The appellant appealed through the courts, challenging the validity of the proceedings and penalty.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases