{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant's dismissal was unlawful","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant was on sick leave; disciplinary hearing held; appellant admitted wrongdoing"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the claim for underpayment is founded","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant based claim on commercial sector CBA; respondent falls under medical industry NEC"}
{"issue_text":"Whether terminal benefits should be calculated based on claimed underpayment salary","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Terminal benefits claim; underpayment claim"}
{"issue_text":"Whether medical expenses claim can be raised on appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Medical expenses not referred to arbitration; not dealt with at arbitration"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant was dismissed from employment while on sick leave. She claimed the new owners of the pharmacy dismissed her due to poor health. The dismissal followed a disciplinary hearing where she was found guilty and admitted wrongdoing. She also claimed underpayments based on a collective bargaining agreement, but the respondent's operations fell under a different NEC.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases