{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding that the disciplinary proceedings were a nullity due to non-compliance with section 124 of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Institution of disciplinary proceedings during arbitration; failure to notify arbitrator"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant's argument that section 124 does not apply to Code of Conduct proceedings has merit","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature of disciplinary proceedings under Code of Conduct"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondents repudiated their contracts by forming Real Sky Travel","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Formation of new company"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondents were employees of the appellant. Following failed retrenchment negotiations, the appellant instituted disciplinary proceedings against the respondents while arbitration on the retrenchment matter was ongoing. The appellant dismissed the respondents in absentia. The second arbitrator found the dismissal unlawful, a decision the appellant appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases