ReinstatementStruck off the rollCondonationPractice Directive No.3 of 2013
Tags
ReinstatementStruck offPractice Directive
legislation
Statutes Cited
Practice Directive No.3 of 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether a fatally defective matter struck off the roll can be reinstated by correcting the defect, or whether the applicant must apply for condonation and file a fresh application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Matter struck off due to defective affidavit; applicant corrected affidavit; applicant conceded correct procedure is condonation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to reinstate an application that was previously struck off the roll due to a defective affidavit. The first respondent opposed, arguing that a struck-off matter is a nullity and the correct procedure is to apply for condonation and file a fresh application. The applicant conceded this was the correct procedure, but the second respondent insisted on reinstatement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases