{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in dismissing claims for underpayments from 2009 to March 2012 on prescription grounds","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The claims were older than two years when the matter was referred to the labour officer"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the dispute regarding 2009 wages interrupted prescription","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The 2009 wages were subject to a protracted dispute which ended in the Supreme Court in 2012"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against an arbitration award that dismissed his claim for underpayments from 2009 to March 2012 on prescription grounds. The arbitrator found that the claim was time-barred under Section 94(1) of the Labour Act, which requires disputes to be referred within two years of arising. The court upheld the arbitrator's decision.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases