{"issue_text":"Whether the State's decision to close its case and accept a lesser plea is binding on the court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"State's decision to accept s 89(1) plea after failing to secure pathologist"}
{"issue_text":"Whether a post-mortem report can be produced in the absence of the pathologist under s 278 of the CP&E Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Accused's objection to post-mortem report without pathologist's attendance"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the State has established a prima facie case for murder","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All evidence of assault and cause of death"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The accused, a police officer, was charged with murder for assaulting the deceased while in custody. The deceased was severely beaten, became unable to walk, and later died. The State sought to accept a lesser plea after failing to secure the pathologist's attendance, but the court found a prima facie case for murder and rejected the State's decision.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases