{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff's claim had prescribed under the Prescription Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Loan due 30 November 2012, action instituted 20 July 2016, debt secured by mortgage bond"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff bank provided a US$3 million loan facility to the first defendant on 23 November 2012, secured by a mortgage bond and sureties. When the defendants failed to repay, the plaintiff instituted action on 20 July 2016. The defendants raised a special plea of prescription, arguing the claim was time-barred after 3 years, while the plaintiff contended that the 30-year prescription period applied because the debt was secured by a mortgage bond.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases