Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Technoimpex JSC v Rajendrakumar Jog & 3 Ors

SC 29/22

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
22 February 2022
Citation
SC 29/22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWSC 29
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Guvava JA
Author
Uchena JA
Full Bench
Guvava JAUchena JAKudya AJA
Areas of Law
Civil procedureProperty lawHigh Court Act
Keywords
InterdictRescissionConsent orderInterlocutory orderLeave to appealDefault judgment
Tags
Property disputeInterdictRescission of judgmentConsent orderInterlocutory order
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]
  • High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether appellant consented to order discharging provisional order and can therefore not appeal against it","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Parties' agreement before Musithu J; submissions by Advocate Magwaliba"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether appellant can appeal against interlocutory order striking application off roll without leave of court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Order striking off for lack of authority; s 43(2)(d) High Court Act"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Bulgarian company Technoimpex JSC, owner of Bath Mansions Flats in Harare, sought rescission of default judgment and interdict against transfer of its property. High Court struck off rescission application and discharged interdict by consent. Supreme Court appeal challenged on procedural grounds regarding validity of notice of appeal against consent and interlocutory orders.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →