Section 16BFormer ConstitutionAgricultural landCompulsory acquisitionLeave to appeal
Tags
Land reformConstitutional jurisdictionLeave to appeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Former Constitution of Zimbabwe
Supreme Court Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether it is in the interests of justice to grant leave to appeal against the Supreme Court decision","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application filed on 22 March 2018"}
{"issue_text":"Whether a constitutional matter was before the Supreme Court","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Interpretation of section 16B(2) of former Constitution"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Supreme Court properly applied section 16B(2) of the former Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Land listed in Schedule 7, errors in description"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court against a Supreme Court decision concerning the compulsory acquisition of agricultural land under Zimbabwe's land reform programme. The dispute involved Lot 1 of subdivided farmland that was allegedly acquired by the State in 2000, with complex issues regarding the validity of acquisition notices and subsequent transfer to the first applicant.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases