Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Tawurayi Marvin Kashiri v Ysmin Tacklah Mohammed

HH 749-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
14 November 2018
Citation
HH 749-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 749
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Mathonsi J
Full Bench
Mathonsi J
Areas of Law
Property lawCivil procedure
Keywords
Co-ownershipProperty transferDeed of settlementCourt order enforcementEstoppelValuation dispute
Tags
Property transferCo-ownershipDeed of settlementCourt order enforcement
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • ,
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • a
  • p
  • p
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • x
  • c
  • l
  • u
  • s
  • i
  • v
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • (
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • t
  • ,
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • o
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • l
  • ,
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • i
  • n
  • h
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • j
  • u
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • d
  • i
  • c
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • H
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • t
  • o
  • e
  • n
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • c
  • e
  • i
  • t
  • s
  • o
  • w
  • n
  • o
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • )
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant is entitled to enforcement of the court order for transfer of the respondent's share in the property","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Payment made, respondent failed to transfer"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the valuation correction invalidates the agreement","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Guest & Tanner valuation change from $292,000 to $192,000"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant and respondent were co-owners of immovable property. They entered into a deed of settlement in 2017 which became a court order, providing for the applicant to purchase the respondent's 50% share based on agreed valuations. The applicant paid the agreed amount within the stipulated timeframe, but the respondent failed to transfer her share, leading to this application for enforcement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →