{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in awarding overtime for Saturdays and Sundays without evidence","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Time sheets only available for limited periods, no Sunday overtime records"}
{"issue_text":"Whether portion of overtime claim had prescribed under section 94 of Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claim referred to conciliation in January 2014"}
{"issue_text":"Whether damages for unlawful dismissal were properly awarded without evidence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No evidence led on quantification of damages"}
{"issue_text":"Whether notice pay award was legally justified","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator found permanent contract, appellant claimed fixed term"}
{"issue_text":"Whether underpayments award was supported by evidence","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No evidence showing calculation method"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was employed as a till operator from August 2010 to June 2013. He claimed unfair dismissal and non-payment of terminal benefits. An arbitrator awarded him various amounts including overtime and damages. The appellant appealed against the arbitral award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases