{"issue_text":"Whether court a quo dealt with all issues raised","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Ground 1.5 regarding fictitious emails not addressed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant was guilty of conduct inconsistent with employment contract","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Feedmix booking failures; Ministry legacy debt violations"}
{"issue_text":"Whether dismissal penalty was appropriate","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First offence; availability of lesser penalty"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Employee appealed against dismissal for gross misconduct involving failure to complete client bookings and violating legacy debt policy. Supreme Court dismissed appeal, upholding dismissal as justified.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases