Tamuka Moyo Attorneys v Shadreck Chisoko

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding that the employment contract was unlawfully terminated","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"May 5 meeting circumstances, respondent's failure to report for duty, Mabika's evidence"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the respondent is entitled to notice pay","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Finding that contract was not unlawfully terminated"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in awarding 30 days leave instead of 25 days","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract clause 7.2 provided 25 days, respondent worked 1 year 4 months"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether commission is payable on unpaid fee notes","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract provided commission on \"fees charged\", fee notes for Wen Zhou Enterprises and Bern Win Property unpaid"}

Background