{"issue_text":"Whether the employee was unlawfully dismissed from a permanent contract","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract terms, communication about 2-year duration"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there was underpayment of wages","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Payslip evidence showing payments below US$2000"}
{"issue_text":"Whether employee is entitled to compensation for motor vehicle use","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Claim of US$2500 based on AA rates without substantiation"}
{"issue_text":"Whether employee can claim medical aid benefit without proof of expenditure","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employee claimed employer agreed to pay medical aid contributions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether tax refund claim can be entertained","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Issue not part of arbitrator's terms of reference, ZIMRA jurisdiction"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The employer appealed against an arbitral award that allowed the employee's claims for underpayment of wages and medical aid benefit, while the employee cross-appealed against the dismissal of his claims for unlawful dismissal, motor vehicle compensation and tax refund.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases