{"issue_text":"Whether respondent should be granted indulgence to file notice of response out of time","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Personal service on 12 November 2015; no response filed; application made on hearing date"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant noted an appeal against an arbitral award. The respondent failed to file a notice of response within the prescribed time despite being personally served. At the hearing, respondent's counsel sought indulgence to file the notice of response late, which the court denied and proceeded in terms of Rule 22(b)(i).
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases