PrescriptionNotarial bondDebt collectionLimitation period
Tags
BankingDebt recoveryPrescriptionNotarial contract
legislation
Statutes Cited
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff's claim was prescribed under the Prescription Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Loan maturity 15 Feb 2012, summons issued 28 Oct 2015, debt secured by notarial bond"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff bank advanced $130,000 to the defendants under a facility letter dated 15 February 2011, with maturity date 15 February 2012. The debt was secured by a notarial general covering bond registered under number 1745/2011. When defendants failed to pay, plaintiff issued summons on 28 October 2015. Defendants raised prescription as a defence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases