Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Stephen Zvinavakobvu and Zvinavakobvu Law Chambers v City of Harare

HH 55-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
1 February 2017
Citation
HH 55-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 55
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
MWAYERA J
Full Bench
MWAYERA JMUNANGATI-MANOGWA JJ
Areas of Law
Property lawSpoliationMunicipal law
Keywords
spoliation orderpeaceful possessionself-helpadvertising signsmunicipal bylaws
Tags
spoliationmunicipal lawadvertising signs
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • f
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • -
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the appellants were entitled to spoliation relief","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Peaceful possession of signs, forceful removal without consent"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in dismissing the spoliation application","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Requirements of spoliation remedy"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellants, who operated a law firm at No. 3 Flint Way Close Hillside Harare, had erected neon and direction signs for advertising their business. The respondent, City of Harare, removed these signs without court order, claiming authority under municipal bylaws controlling outdoor advertising. The appellants sought spoliation relief in the court a quo, which was dismissed, leading to this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →