{"issue_text":"Whether applicant has a prima facie right to interdict property transfer","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant sold to Hlambelo, property still in his name"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there is well-grounded apprehension of irreparable harm","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Property no longer belongs to applicant"}
{"issue_text":"Whether balance of convenience favors granting interdict","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant paid 17 years ago, first respondent occupied for 18 years"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, registered owner of a property, sought an interdict to prevent transfer of the property to the first respondent, claiming he never sold it to her. He admitted selling it to Hlambelo in 2002, who later sold it to the first respondent's late husband. The property transfer process was underway when the applicant discovered it and alleged fraud.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases