{"issue_text":"Whether respondents committed an act of insolvency under section 11(b) of the Insolvency Act","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Unsatisfied judgment debt, nulla bona returns, no payments made"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant met requirements for sequestration under section 12 and 13 of the Insolvency Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant is judgment creditor with liquidated claim"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondents have sufficient means to satisfy the judgment debt","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Claims of farming income, cattle ownership, vehicle and property ownership"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondents, husband and wife, obtained a loan from the applicant bank but failed to service it. The bank obtained a judgment for provisional sentence against them for $231,171.60 with interest, which remained unsatisfied despite multiple execution attempts returning nulla bona. The respondents opposed the sequestration application claiming they had sufficient assets and means to pay.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases