{"issue_text":"Whether defendants have a bona fide defence to summary judgment","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendants entered appearance to defend; disputed interest rate and third defendant's liability"}
{"issue_text":"Whether third defendant is liable as guarantor despite signing in witness space","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Third defendant signed unlimited guarantee document; signed in witness space rather than guarantor space"}
{"issue_text":"Whether 25.85% interest rate is usurious and applicable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Loan agreement provided for fluctuating interest; defendants claimed fixed 14% rate"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Stanbic Bank extended a US$25,000 loan facility to Vegra Merchants in August 2012 for maize and beans trading, with 90-day tenure. The second and third respondents guaranteed the loan as co-principal debtors. The first defendant defaulted, accumulating arrears of US$26,127.56. The bank applied for summary judgment after defendants entered appearance to defend.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases