Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe Limited v Prodigy Chinanga and Elvis Mudzengerere N.O.

LC/H/205/23

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
11 July 2023
Citation
LC/H/205/23
Neutral Citation
[2023] ZWLC 205
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Review

Bench

Presiding
Kudya J
Full Bench
Kudya J
Areas of Law
Labour lawEmployment disputesAdministrative review
Keywords
designated agentjurisdictioninternal remediesgross irrationalitylabour dispute
Tags
review applicationdesignated agent jurisdictioninternal remedies
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Did the Designated Agent have jurisdiction to deal with the matter despite existence of internal remedies under the Code of Conduct?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employee had left employ; Code of Conduct existed; discrimination claim against employer"}
  • {"issue_text":"Did the Designated Agent act in a grossly irrational manner in entertaining the employee's complaint?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Internal remedies available; employer as judge in own case"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe Limited brought a review application challenging a Designated Agent's decision that found the bank liable for unfair labour practice. The employee had approached the Designated Agent alleging discrimination after leaving the bank's employ, claiming no effective internal remedy existed under the banking sector Code of Conduct.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →