{"issue_text":"Did the Designated Agent have jurisdiction to deal with the matter despite existence of internal remedies under the Code of Conduct?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employee had left employ; Code of Conduct existed; discrimination claim against employer"}
{"issue_text":"Did the Designated Agent act in a grossly irrational manner in entertaining the employee's complaint?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Internal remedies available; employer as judge in own case"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe Limited brought a review application challenging a Designated Agent's decision that found the bank liable for unfair labour practice. The employee had approached the Designated Agent alleging discrimination after leaving the bank's employ, claiming no effective internal remedy existed under the banking sector Code of Conduct.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases