Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe Limited v Ceezed Construction (Private) Limited and Costain Africa (Private) Limited and Southview Investments (Private) Limited

HH 8-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
10 January 2018
Citation
HH 8-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 8
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
CHAREWA J
Areas of Law
Banking LawCommercial LawSuretyship Law
Keywords
SuretyshipOverdraft FacilityBankingGuaranteeCo-principal Debtors
Tags
Banking LawSuretyshipCommercial LawDebt Recovery
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Companies Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the deeds of suretyship executed by second and third defendants are valid and legally binding","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Signatures on surety deeds, authority of signatories, internal company procedures"}
  • {"issue_text":"What amount must second and third defendants pay to plaintiff","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Principal debt acknowledged, interest calculations, co-principal debtor status"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Stanbic Bank claimed $3,070,207.04 from Ceezed Construction and its sureties Costain Africa and Southview Investments for money lent under an overdraft facility. The sureties disputed liability claiming the surety deeds were invalid and signed without authority, while the bank maintained the deeds were valid and binding.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →