Stanbic Bank v Sitwell Gumbo

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Did appellant lawfully terminate respondent's probationary contract through the 19 April 2011 letter?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Third termination based on expiry of probation, no standards given, no assessment done"}
• {"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator misdirect himself in concluding that the expiry of probation was irrelevant?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Probation period had expired by April 2011"}
• {"issue_text":"Did payment for April 2011 to July 2010 amount to confirmation of reinstatement?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Payment made as back pay under Muzondo award"}
• {"issue_text":"Was the payment of back pay partial compliance with the Muzondo award?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"USD$8,883.36 paid covering July 2010 to April 2011"}

Background