{"issue_text":"Whether the defence of lis pendens is available where the previous case has lapsed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"HC 2719/19 lapsed in terms of Practice Direction 1 of 2022"}
{"issue_text":"Whether prescription applies to an action for rei vindicatio","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff suing to recover its property from illegal occupation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The defendant, a former employee of the plaintiff, continued to occupy company property allocated as a condition of service after resignation in 2013. The plaintiff sued for eviction in 2024. The defendant raised special pleas of prescription and lis pendens.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases